@article { , title = {Rockford Trilogy Ltd v NCR Ltd.}, abstract = {Discusses Rockford Trilogy Ltd v NCR Ltd (IH) on the concept of the renewal of leases by tacit relocation, focusing on the exclusion of tacit relocation by implied, informal notice.}, issn = {0036-908X}, issue = {20}, journal = {Scots law times}, note = {INFO COMPLETE (Info via Westlaw alert 24/6/2022 LM) PERMISSION GRANTED (version = AAM; embargo = 12 months; licence = BY-NC-ND; SHERPA = https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/28906 25/6/2022 LM) DOCUMENT READY (AAM rec'd from contact 27/6/2022 LM) ADDITIONAL INFO - Contact: Craig Anderson Set Statement - (This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Scots Law Times following peer review. The definitive published version ANDERSON, C. 2022. Rockford Trilogy Ltd v NCR Ltd. Scots law times [online], 2022(20), pages 111-112, is available online on Westlaw UK [http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/].)}, pages = {111-112}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Sweet and Maxwell}, url = {https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1697293}, volume = {2022}, keyword = {Business tenancies, Intention, Renewal, Scotland}, year = {2022}, author = {Anderson, Craig} }