@article { , title = {Complementarity or disparity?}, abstract = {Interest in the use of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving commercial disputes has grown tremendously in the last two decades. This growth could be credited to the awareness by national governments and international bodies to change the culutre of strict litigation and allow parties some autonomy in resolving their disputes. Both UNCITRAL Law Internatinal Commercial Arbitration and English Arbitration Act 1996 have changed disputing-resloving culture in business environment. This article revisits the relationship of these two systems of arbitration and examines the extent they have contributed to the development of use of arbitration across different commercial terrains.}, issue = {1}, journal = {University of Ibadan law journal}, note = {COMPLETED -- Permission rec'd 4/10/2016 LM -- Chased 3/10/2016 LM -- Emailed for permission to aleroakeredolu@yahoo.com \& uniblawjournal@gmail.com (info from Bukola 6/9/2016) 8/9/2016 LM -- No reply, requested doc from contact 2/9/2016 LM -- Sent email to library at UI to request information 1/8/2016 -- Requested pub contact details from author 23/5/2016 LM -- Article published 8/5/2012 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Faturoti, Bukola}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {University of Ibadan}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10059/1884}, volume = {12}, keyword = {Arbitration, Commercial disputes, Litigation, Model law}, year = {2012}, author = {Faturoti, B.} }