Adam Abdulla
Asking students to recall success may not enhance their perceived self-efficacy.
Abdulla, Adam
Authors
Abstract
The aim of this study was to discover whether asking students to recall success ('solicited ME recall') enhances PSE for an important skill – writing ideation. In Experiment 1, students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (i) Solicited Focal ME recall, (ii) Solicited Non-Focal ME recall, or (iii) a control group. It was hypothesised that solicited focal ME recall (i.e. recall concerning the skill-in-question) leads to higher PSE than the Non-Focal or control condition. In addition, it was hypothesised that ease-of-retrieval (i.e. the ease/difficulty with which examples are recalled) is associated with posttest PSE during solicited ME recall. Although mean PSE was highest in the Focal ME recall condition, effect sizes were extremely small and differences were not statistically significant. Ease-of-retrieval predicted posttest PSE, but this relationship did not appear to depend on condition. In Experiment 2, students were randomly assigned to either the Focal ME recall or control condition. Results suggested that baseline PSE does not moderate the effect of the intervention on PSE. Although posttest PSE was higher in the ME recall than in the control condition, the effect size was again very small and the difference was not statistically significant. When baseline PSE was controlled, ease-of-retrieval continued to predict posttest PSE. The interaction between ease-of-retrieval and condition (in predicting posttest PSE) was close to statistical significance. This study suggests that asking students to recall success may not be enough to raise their PSE. This has extremely important implications for educators, schools and commentators alike.
Citation
ABDULLA, A. 2021. Asking students to recall success may not enhance their perceived self-efficacy. Learning and individual differences [online], 87, article ID 101984. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101984
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 8, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 24, 2021 |
Publication Date | Apr 30, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Feb 11, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 25, 2022 |
Journal | Learning and individual differences |
Print ISSN | 1041-6080 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-3425 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 87 |
Article Number | 101984 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101984 |
Keywords | Perceived self-efficacy; Mastery experience; Ease-of-retrieval; Writing |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1187805 |
Files
ABDULLA 2021 Asking students (AAM)
(447 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Solution-focused scaling questions: time taken, words written, expectancy and commitment.
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search