Adrian Gonzalez
Who wants North Sea CCS, and why? Assessing differences in opinion between oil and gas industry respondents and wider energy and environmental stakeholders.
Gonzalez, Adrian; Mabon, Leslie; Agarwal, Abhishek
Authors
Leslie Mabon
Abhishek Agarwal
Abstract
Although Scotland and the wider UK is making good progress with research and development towards deployment of offshore carbon capture and storage, there is increasing divergence in opinion on the necessity of CCS for meeting climate change targets. Oil and gas operators appear optimistic about the technical feasibility of CCS; whereas civil society and NGOs are increasingly vocal in their scepticism towards the necessity of CCS in a net-zero society. Given that operators’ expertise may be required to support offshore CO2 storage given their subsea experience, and that civil society is important in shaping government and public opinion, this divergence may be a challenge to offshore CCS deployment in the UK and elsewhere. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the grounds on which oil and gas operators’ views on CCS differ from a wider range of stakeholders, through a survey and in-depth interviews. Our results show that people with more knowledge of CCS are more likely to support its deployment, and that strong belief in anthropogenic climate change is lower – albeit rising – among oil and gas respondents. Our results also show concern that the net-zero transition may have negative effects for carbon-intensive regions, and that storage expertise is the UK’s strongest skill set for CCS deployment. We suggest that across a range of stakeholders, the value of CCS is thus most likely to lie in specific applications (e.g. hydrogen) and/or very specific localities (e.g. places with existing subsurface knowledge and skills), rather than widespread deployment as a mitigation technology.
Citation
GONZALEZ, A., MABON, L. and AGARWAL, A. 2021. Who wants North Sea CCS, and why? Assessing differences in opinion between oil and gas industry respondents and wider energy and environmental stakeholders. International journal of greenhouse gas control [online], 106, article ID 103288. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103288
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 16, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 28, 2021 |
Publication Date | Mar 31, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Feb 18, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 1, 2022 |
Journal | International journal of greenhouse gas control |
Print ISSN | 1750-5836 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-0148 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 106 |
Article Number | 103288 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103288 |
Keywords | Carbon capture and storage; Just transition; North Sea; Offshore CCS; Oil and gas |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1206325 |
Files
GONZALEZ 2021 Who wants North
(667 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
A holistic power systems asset engineering and decision management framework for railway asset managers.
(2022)
Preprint / Working Paper
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search