Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Production of biobank data for the needs of civil and criminal proceedings: jurisprudence from the EU states.

Lytvynenko, Anatoliy A.

Authors

Anatoliy A. Lytvynenko



Abstract

The purposes of retaining biological material may be diverse. Biorepositories, which are containers of biological materials, are referred to as biobanks in English-language scholarship or biotheques in French. There is no uniform agreement in legal and medical scholarship as to the scope of biological material to be maintained in order for an institution to be called a 'biobank', or the actual aim of such maintenance. At present, special techniques are already able to determine the identity of the individual whose biological material is retained; thus, in case such data is identifiable using various techniques, they should be considered as personal data in accordance with the recent judgment of the Latvian Senate, No. SKA-166/2020. Such an inference is quite apparent, but this issue requires the resolution of the situation whereby biobank data could legitimately be produced for the necessity of administering justice, and whether this would be possible in principle. The court practice of the Nordic States already holds that a court may allow the production of biobank records, but this heavily depends upon the circumstances of the case: such situations may arise in civil litigation relating to paternity claims or to the right to know one’s origin, and prosecution offices may opt to request biobank data for investigating suspicious deaths. In some other instances, biobanks, cryobanks, and medical institutions governing biobanks may be sued for illegitimate collection and maintenance of biological samples without the notification of the party involved – which are known in the United States of America, as well as one outstanding case in Iceland. The current situation concerning litigation relating to legitimate biobank data disclosure is evolving, and the legislation relating to it is either frequently absent, or lacks clarification. In this paper, the author calls for the clarification of legitimate instances where biobank data could be disclosed for the needs of court proceedings upon the examples of Latvian law, and highlights the current jurisprudential developments in respect to litigation against biobanks and the institutions governing them in respect to an alleged privacy violation.

Citation

LYTVYNENKO, A.A. 2021. Production of biobank data for the needs of civil and criminal proceedings: jurisprudence from the EU states. International comparative jurisprudence [online], 7(2), pages 169-189. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2021.12.005

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 8, 2021
Online Publication Date Dec 27, 2021
Publication Date Dec 31, 2021
Deposit Date Feb 8, 2022
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal International Comparative Jurisprudence
Electronic ISSN 2351-6674
Publisher Mykolo Romerio Universitas
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue 2
Pages 169-189
DOI https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2021.12.005
Keywords Biobanks; Biorepositories; Medical confidentiality; Civil procedure; Criminal procedure; Paternity claims; Right to know one’s origination; Biobank secrecy; Missing person search
Public URL https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1591848

Files

LYTVYNENKO 2021 Production of biobank data (VOR) (584 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Mykolas Romeris University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).




You might also like



Downloadable Citations