Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Belokon v. Kyrgyzstan: practical implications of award set-asides arising from corruption allegations.

Lai, Roslyn; Mak, Charles Ho Wang

Authors

Roslyn Lai



Abstract

As one of the most arbitration-friendly jurisdictions, French courts have long had a tradition of judicial non-interference in the arbitral process. In the context of annulment proceedings, French courts are normally granted limited scope in reviewing arbitral awards. However, on 23rd March 2022, the French Cour de Cassation (France's supreme court of appeal on matters of law) upheld a 2017 Paris Court of Appeal decision vacating a US$15 billion UNCITRAL award against Kyrgyzstan in Belokon v. Kyrgyzstan. The Paris Court of Appeal had set aside the award based on international public policy, as enforcement of the arbitral award would enable the investor to profit from money laundering revenues. In reaching this decision, the Paris Court of Appeal had relied on documents and evidence that were not previously produced or relied upon by the arbitral tribunal. The Cour de Cassation judgement brings welcome confirmation that French judges have full authority and an expanded scope of fact-finding powers when reviewing the implications of enforcing an arbitral award on the grounds of international public policy due to allegations of corruption and money laundering. This Insight aims to highlight the key findings in these decisions and briefly touch on comparative developments in the English courts.

Citation

LAI, R. and MAK, C.H.W. 2022. Belokon v. Kyrgyzstan: practical implications of award set-asides arising from corruption allegations. ASIL insights [online], 26(14). Available from: https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/26/issue/14

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 12, 2022
Online Publication Date Dec 14, 2022
Publication Date Dec 14, 2022
Deposit Date Jul 19, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 19, 2023
Journal ASIL insights
Publisher American Society of International Law
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 26
Issue 14
Keywords International arbitration; Banking; Financial regulations; France
Public URL https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2015247
Publisher URL https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/26/issue/14

Files

LAI 2022 Belokon v Kyrgyzstan (VOR) (244 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© American Society of International Law




You might also like



Downloadable Citations