Danielle Pollock
The role of scoping reviews in guideline development.
Pollock, Danielle; Khalil, Hanan; Evans, Catrin; Godfrey, Christina; Pieper, Dawid; Alexander, Lyndsay; Tricco, Andrea C.; McInerney, Patricia; Peters, Micah D.J.; Klugar, Miloslav; Falavigna, Maicon; Stein, Airton Tetelbom; Qaseem, Amir; Brandão de Moraes, Erica; Saran, Ashrita; Ding, Sandrine; Barker, Timothy Hugh; Florez, Ivan D.; Jia, Romy Menghao; Munn, Zachary
Authors
Hanan Khalil
Catrin Evans
Christina Godfrey
Dawid Pieper
Dr Lyndsay Alexander l.a.alexander@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Andrea C. Tricco
Patricia McInerney
Micah D.J. Peters
Miloslav Klugar
Maicon Falavigna
Airton Tetelbom Stein
Amir Qaseem
Erica Brandão de Moraes
Ashrita Saran
Sandrine Ding
Timothy Hugh Barker
Ivan D. Florez
Romy Menghao Jia
Zachary Munn
Abstract
Systematic reviews have long been seen as critical in the development of trustworthy guidelines. However, as newer synthesis methodologies such as scoping reviews become more common, there is a need to discuss the potential role of these methodologies within guideline development. This article aims to summarize and provide examples of the role of scoping reviews in guideline development. Drawing on the expertise of the JBI scoping review group and guideline developers, this discussion article summarizes five key roles of scoping reviews in guideline development. Guideline developers can consider using scoping reviews when they need to: 1) know what existing guidelines could be adopted, adapted or adoloped; 2) understand the breadth of evidence that exists on a particular issue and help with the development and prioritization of questions, or identify previous systematic reviews; 3) identify contextual factors and information relevant for a clinical practice recommendation; 4) identify potential strategies for implementation and monitoring and; 5) conduct evidence surveillance and living mapping approaches. Scoping reviews conducted and reported according to best-practice guidelines and standards can be used in conjunction with systematic reviews to support the work of guideline developers usefully.
Citation
POLLOCK, D.K., KHALIL, H., EVANS, C. et al. 2024. The role of scoping reviews in guideline development. Journal of clinical epidemiology [online], 169, article number 111301. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111301
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 19, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 27, 2024 |
Publication Date | May 31, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Apr 5, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 5, 2024 |
Journal | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
Print ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-5921 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 169 |
Article Number | 111301 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111301 |
Keywords | Methodology; Guidelines; Scoping reviews; Health care policy |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2275510 |
Files
POLLOCK 2024 The role of scoping reviews (VOR)
(217 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources.
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search