Graeme Baxter
Scottish citizens' perceptions of the credibility of online political 'facts' in the 'fake news' era: an exploratory study.
Baxter, Graeme; Marcella, Rita; Walicka, Agnieszka
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study that explored public perceptions of the credibility of 'facts and figures' contained within five social media posts produced by political parties in Scotland. The study consisted of an online survey conducted in Spring 2017 (n=538). Respondents were asked to gauge the reliability of 'facts' contained within the posts, to provide reasons for their answers, and to indicate how they might go about confirming or debunking the figures. Less than half the sample believed the posts’ content would be reliable. Credibility perceptions were influenced by various factors, including: a lack of cited sources; concerns about bias or spin; a lack of detail, definitions, or contextual information; personal political allegiance and trust; negative campaign techniques; personal experience of policy issues; and more intuitive judgements. Only small numbers admitted that they would not know how to find out more about the issues, or would be disinclined to look further. The majority appeared confident in their own abilities to find further information, yet were vague in describing their search strategies. Relatively little empirical research has been conducted exploring the perceived credibility of political or government information online. It is believed that this is the first such study to have specifically investigated the Scottish political arena.
Citation
BAXTER, G., MARCELLA, R. and WALICKA, A. 2019. Scottish citizens’ perceptions of the credibility of online political 'facts' in the 'fake news' era: an exploratory study. Journal of documentation [online], 75(5), pages 1100-1123. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2018-0161
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 24, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 9, 2019 |
Publication Date | Oct 31, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Mar 8, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 9, 2019 |
Journal | Journal of documentation |
Print ISSN | 0022-0418 |
Electronic ISSN | 1758-7379 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 75 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 1100-1123 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2018-0161 |
Keywords | Information behaviour; Credibility; Fake news; Political parties; Scotland; Alternative facts |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/227974 |
Contract Date | Mar 12, 2019 |
Files
BAXTER 2019 Scottish citizens' perceptions
(984 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Twitter response to televised political debates in Election 2015.
(2015)
Book Chapter
Blood has been spilt on that spot: exploring the relationship between the supernatural and the library and information sciences.
(-0001)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
'If your mother says she loves you, check it out': citizens' approaches to evaluating the credibility of information provided online by political actors in Scotland.
(-0001)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search