Gregor Ferguson
Decision-making on the use of compression hosiery and compression bandaging: a systematic review.
Ferguson, Gregor; Baguley, Fiona
Authors
Fiona Baguley
Abstract
This systematic literature review was carried out by a final-year nursing student in response to clinical experience, and to understand the rationale and evidence around managing venous ulcers. In the student's clinical experience, the two most commonly used treatment methods were forms of compression hosiery and compression bandaging. The CINAHL, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Internurse and MEDLINE databases were searched for literature published over the period 2003–2023. From the resulting five papers, five key themes were identified: types of compression systems used and the rationale for decision-making; clinical effectiveness; the impact on patient experience and quality of life; pain levels following application of compression systems; and cost effectiveness. Management and prevention of venous ulceration is complex. The decisions should be made in partnership with the patient and will be influenced by context. Overall, compression hosiery was identified as the more favourable system.
Citation
FERGUSON, G. and BAGULEY, F. 2024. Decision-making on the use of compression hosiery and compression bandaging: a systematic review. British journal of community nursing [online], 29(Sup 3), pages S20-S25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2024.29.Sup3.S20
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 1, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 13, 2024 |
Publication Date | Mar 31, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Mar 28, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 14, 2024 |
Journal | British journal of community nursing |
Print ISSN | 1462-4753 |
Electronic ISSN | 2052-2215 |
Publisher | Mark Allen Healthcare |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 29 |
Issue | Sup3 |
Pages | S20-S25 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2024.29.Sup3.S20 |
Keywords | Compression therapy; Lower limb venous ulceration; Evidence-based clinical practice; Nurse education; Mixed-methods systematic review |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2284241 |
Files
FERGUSON 2024 Decision-making on the use (AAM)
(891 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in British Journal of Community Nursing, copyright © MA Healthcare, after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2024.29.Sup3.S20.
You might also like
Caseload profiling in district nursing: a systematic literature review.
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search