Policy translation: a reply.

Spicker, Paul

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is explained as being to enhance the analysis of processes of movement of ideas between multiple actors and in the process of implementation of social policies. The core argument made by Latour is, as I read it, that networks are interactive and extendable, and that across the associations of a network, Every network surrounds itself with its own frame of reference, its own definition of growth, of referring, of framing. Policy transfer is based, consequently, on the development of a common discourse through a process of networking.

Citation

SPICKER, P. 2016. Policy translation: a reply. Global discourse: an interdisciplinary journal of current affairs and applied contemporary thought [online], 6(1-2), pages 116-118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2015.1004251

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jan 23, 2015
• Online Publication Date: Jan 23, 2015
• Publication Date: Feb 28, 2016
• Deposit Date: Sep 15, 2016
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 15, 2016
• Journal: Global discourse: an interdisciplinary journal of current affairs and applied contemporary thought
• Print ISSN: 2326-9995
• Electronic ISSN: 2043-7897
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 116-118
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2015.1004251
• Keywords: Advocacy coalitions; Policy streams; Path dependency; Punctuated equilibrium; Paradigm shifts; Policymaking; Policy transfers
• Public URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10059/1708