Comparative assessment of visible light and UV active photocatalysts by hydroxyl radical quantification.
Nagarajan, Sanjay; Skillen, Nathan C.; Fina, Federica; Zhang, Guan; Randorn, Chamnan; Lawton, Linda A.; Irvine, John T.S.; Robertson, Peter K.J.
Nathan C. Skillen
Professor Linda Lawton firstname.lastname@example.org
John T.S. Irvine
Peter K.J. Robertson
A simple method for determining hydroxyl radical yields on semiconductor photocatalysts is highly desirable, especially when comparing different photocatalyst materials. This paper reports the screening of a selection of visible light active photocatalysts such as Pt-C3N4, 5% LaCr doped SrTiO3, Sr0.95Cr0.05TiO3 and Yellow TiO2 and compares them against WO3 and ultra violet (UV) light activated TiO2 P25 (standard commercial catalysts) based on their oxidative strengths (OH radical producing capability) using a well-studied chemical probe?coumarin. 7-hydroxycoumarin, the only fluorescent hydroxylation product of this reaction can then be measured to indirectly quantify the OH radicals produced. P25 under UV light produced the highest concentration of OH radicals (16.9 'M), followed by WO3 (0.56 'M) and Pt-C3N4 (0.25 'M). The maximum OH radical production rate for P25, WO3 and Pt-C3N4 were also determined and found to be 35.6 'M/hr, 0.28 'M/h and 0.88 'M/h respectively. The other visible light activated photocatalysts did not produce any OH radicals primarily as a result of their electronic structure. Furthermore, it was concluded that, if any visible light absorbing photocatalysts are to be fabricated in future for the purpose of photocatalytic oxidation, their OH radical producing rates (and quantities) should be determined and compared to P25.
NAGARAJAN, S., SKILLEN, N.C., FINA, F., ZHANG, G., RANDORN, C., LAWTON, L.A., IRVINE, J.T.S. and ROBERTSON, P.K.J. 2016. Comparative assessment of visible light and UV active photocatalysts by hydroxyl radical quantification. Journal of photochemistry and photobiology A: chemistry [online], 334, pages 13-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.10.034
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Oct 27, 2016|
|Online Publication Date||Nov 3, 2016|
|Publication Date||Feb 1, 2017|
|Deposit Date||Nov 23, 2016|
|Publicly Available Date||Nov 4, 2017|
|Journal||Journal of photochemistry and photobiology A: chemistry|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Photocatalyst; Visible light photocatalysts; OH radical; Coumarin; P25|
NAGARAJAN 2016 Comparative assessment of visible
Publisher Licence URL
You might also like
Using cellulose polymorphs for enhanced hydrogen production from photocatalytic reforming.
A photocatalytic impeller reactor for gas phase heterogeneous photocatalysis.
Energy efficient operation of photocatalytic reactors based on UV LEDs for pollution remediation in water.
Cellulose II as bioethanol feedstock and its advantages over native cellulose.