Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Deliberative decarbonisation? Assessing the potential of an ethical governance framework for low-carbon energy through the case of carbon dioxide capture and storage.

Mabon, Leslie; Shackley, Simon; Vercelli, Samuela; Anderlucci, Jonathan; Boot, Kelvin

Authors

Leslie Mabon

Simon Shackley

Samuela Vercelli

Jonathan Anderlucci

Kelvin Boot



Abstract

In this paper we explore the potential of a framework of ethical governance for low-carbon energy. Developing mainly in the field of information and communications technology, ethical governance is concerned with the marginalisation of ethical and moral issues during development and deployment of new technologies. Focusing on early carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) projects, we argue that a focus on technical arguments in the governance of low-carbon energy similarly risks sidelining deeper issues such as fairness, justice, and values. We believe an ethical governance approach does have potential for low-carbon energy technologies like CCS, but also that climate change mitigation technologies pose particular challenges for the implementation of ethical governance.

Citation

MABON, L., SHACKLEY, S., VERCELLI, S., ANDERLUCCI, J. and BOOT, K. 2015. Deliberative decarbonisation? Assessing the potential of an ethical governance framework for low-carbon energy through the case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Environment and planning C: government and policy [online], 33(2), pages 256-271. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1068/c12133

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 9, 2014
Online Publication Date Aug 1, 2015
Publication Date Apr 30, 2015
Deposit Date Sep 29, 2017
Publicly Available Date Sep 29, 2017
Journal Environment and planning C: government and policy
Print ISSN 0263-774X
Electronic ISSN 1472-3425
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 2
Pages 256-271
DOI https://doi.org/10.1068/c12133
Keywords Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS); Deliberative democracy; Epistemic justice; Ethical governance; Public engagement
Public URL http://hdl.handle.net/10059/2518