Catherine Paterson
A model of consultation in prostate cancer care: evidence from a systematic review.
Paterson, Catherine; Nabi, Ghulam
Authors
Ghulam Nabi
Abstract
Background: There has been an evolution of various consultation models in the literature. Men affected by prostate cancer can experience a range of unmet supportive care needs. Thus, effective consultations are paramount in the delivery of supportive care to optimize tailored self-management plans at the individual level of need. Objective: The aim of this study is to critically appraise existing models of consultation and make recommendations for a model of consultation within the scope of clinical practice for prostate cancer care. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement Guidelines. Electronic databases were searched using a wide range of keywords and free text items to increase the sensitivity and inclusiveness of the searches. Findings were integrated in a narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 1829 articles were retrieved and 17 papers were included. Beneficial features ranged across a number of models that included a person-centered consultation, shared management plans, and safety netting. None of the reviewed models of consultation are suitable for use in prostate cancer care because of a range of limitations and the clinical context in which models were developed. A Cancer Care Consultation Model was informed from critical appraisal of the evidence and expert clinical and service user comment. Conclusion: Further research is needed to empirically test consultation models in routine clinical practice, specifically for advanced cancer specialist nurses. Implications for Practice: The Prostate Cancer Model of Consultation can be used to structure clinical consultations to target self-management care plans at the individual level of need over the cancer care continuum.
Citation
PATERSON, C. and NABI, G. 2017. A model of consultation in prostate cancer care: evidence from a systematic review. Cancer nursing [online], 40(4), pages 276-288. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000404
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 12, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 27, 2016 |
Publication Date | Aug 31, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Sep 9, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 28, 2017 |
Journal | Cancer nursing |
Print ISSN | 0162-220X |
Electronic ISSN | 1538-9804 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 40 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 276-288 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000404 |
Keywords | Consultation models; Prostate cancer care; Systematic review |
Public URL | http://hdl.handle.net/10059/2913 |
Contract Date | Sep 9, 2016 |
Files
PATERSON 2017 A model of consultation in prostate cancer
(907 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search