Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: a re-interpretation by the Supreme Court.
The existence of a duty of care is central to the law of negligence. The Supreme Court has taken the opportunity to clarify the position of the police with regard to when they will owe a duty of care and, at the same time, to re-formulate the approach to be taken in determining a duty of care.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jun 30, 2018|
|Publisher||Sweet and Maxwell|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Institution Citation||ARNELL, S. 2018. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: a re-interpretation by the Supreme Court. Juridical review [online], 2, pages 128-132. Available from: http://westlaw.co.uk|
|Keywords||Arrest; Duty of care; Personal injury; Police powers and duties|
ARNELL 2018 Robinson v Chief Constable
You might also like
Causation compared: facts, fictions inferences and legal legitimacy.
Employer's vicarious liability: where are we now?
Time for a public policy update in police liability?