The takeup of benefits: lessons from the UK.
Henk Van Hootegem
The issue of take-up has had a prominent role in the consideration of benefits in the UK, and there is a considerable amount of information available about the issues and problems. As time has gone on, however, the comfortable certainties about why people do not claim benefits have come to seem less and less secure. At first it was supposed that a reluctance to claim was the legacy of the stigma of the Poor Law; then it was a problem of means-testing; then, as the emphasis fell increasingly on selective benefits and targeting, it became a matter of trying to ensure that benefits operated more efficiently. None of this is clearly consistent with the evidence we have, and while it is tempting to point the finger at the quality of that evidence, we may have to accept simply that we understand the problems less well than we thought we did.
SPICKER, P. 2017. The takeup of benefits: lessons from the UK. In Van Hootegem, H (ed.) Poverty and ineffectiveness of rights. Bruges: Die Keure [online]. Available from: https://www.diekeure.be/nl-be/professional/8167/armoede-en-ineffectiviteit-van-rechten-pauvrete-et-ineffectivite-des-droits
|Online Publication Date||Jun 30, 2017|
|Publication Date||Jun 30, 2017|
|Deposit Date||Jul 2, 2018|
|Publicly Available Date||Jul 2, 2018|
|Book Title||Poverty and ineffectiveness of rights|
|Keywords||Benefits; UK; Reluctance; Stigma; Claims|
SPICKER 2017 The takeup of benefits
Publisher Licence URL
You might also like
Concepts of need in housing allocation.
Social work and self-determination.
Charles Booth: the examination of poverty.
Needs as claims.
Poverty and depressed estates: a critique of Utopia on trial.