The case for nationality based jurisdiction.
Various recent developments within and without the United Kingdom have strengthened the arguments in favour of the adoption of general nationality based criminal jurisdiction. These arise from problems in the application of territorial jurisdiction, increasingly frequent crime-specific reference to nationality based jurisdiction, the development of European Union law, the ever-greater mobility of nationals, the ability to commit crimes remotely, the incorporation of the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms into United Kingdom law, an evolution in the citizen-state relationship, and the increasing internationalisation of criminal law. It is not suggested that territory should no longer find a central place in the criminal law rather that the original and present arguments in its favour have been greatly weakened and, at the same time, the arguments in favour of nationality based jurisdiction have been strengthened. This article details the present nature of criminal jurisdiction, highlights the deficiencies with territorial jurisdiction and outlines the case in favour of a general nationality based criminal jurisdiction.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Oct 31, 2001|
|Journal||International and comparative law quarterly|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press (CUP)|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Institution Citation||ARNELL, P. 2001. The case for nationality based jurisdiction. International and comparative law quarterly [online], 50(4), pages 955-962. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/50.4.955|
|Keywords||Criminal Law; Jurisdiction; Nationality|
ARNELL 2001 The case for nationality based
You might also like
The forum bar to extradition in Scotland .
The legality of the citizenship deprivation of UK foreign terrorist fighters.
The forum bar in UK extradition law: an unnecessary failure.
Social work and human rights: a practice guide.
Social work and human rights: the international context.