Dr Aileen Grant a.grant17@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Process evaluations are recommended to open the 'black box' of complex interventions evaluated in trials, but there is limited guidance to help with design, with most guidance focused on the use of qualitative methods rather than processes to evaluate. We have developed a framework that identifies a range of candidate processes that an evaluation could examine to understand clusterrandomised intervention implementation and maintenance. These include processes involving clusters (recruitment, delivery of the intervention to the cluster, adoption by the cluster), involving the individuals on whom outcomes are measured (reach, delivery of the intervention to the individual, response of the individual), maintenance, and unintended consequences. Researchers will often have to choose what to focus on because of resource constraints, the framework aims to help researchers make explicit their choices of research questions and methods. We will illustrate application of the framework to the design and conduct of a parallel process evaluation of the Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care trial, which evaluates a complex intervention to improve prescribing safety in 40 general practices. This mixed method process evaluation includes a dominant case study approach in a purposeful sample of practices and hypothesis?testing quantitative analysis of data from all practices examining how key processes are associated with variation in outcome between practices. We will present analysis of qualitative data from the 10 case study practices participating (6 reducing and 4 not reducing targeted prescribing), and focus groups with patients who have had their medication changed as a result of the intervention. Oral presentation presented at the 2nd Clinical Trials Methodology Conference 2013: Methodology matters, 18-19 November 2013, Edinburgh, UK.
GRANT, A., DREISCHULTE, T. and GUTHRIE, B. 2013. Parallel process evaluation using a proposed framework for the design and reporting of process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions. Trials [online], 14(Supplement 1): oral and poster presentations from the 2nd Clinical trials methodology conference 2013: methodology matters, 18-19 November 2013, Edinburgh, UK, Article O88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-O88
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Abstract |
---|---|
Conference Name | 2nd Clinical trials methodology conference 2013: methodology matters |
Acceptance Date | Nov 29, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 29, 2013 |
Publication Date | Nov 29, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 18, 2019 |
Journal | Trials |
Print ISSN | 1745-6215 |
Electronic ISSN | 1745-6215 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Issue | Supplement 1 |
Article Number | O88 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-O88 |
Keywords | Process evaluation; Interventions; Qualitative |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/248991 |
GRANT 2013 Parallel process evaluation (Trials)
(414 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search