Methods for data extraction and data transformation in convergent integrated mixed methods systematic reviews.

Lizarondo, Lucylynn; Stern, Cindy; Salmond, Susan; Carrier, Judith; Cooper, Kay; Godfrey, Christina; Vandyk, Manda; Pollock, Danielle; Rieger, Kendra; Apostolo, Joao; Kirkpatrick, Pamela; Borges Dos Santos, Kelli; Loveday, Heather

Abstract

The objective of this guidance paper is to describe data transformation involving qualitization, including when and how to undertake this process, and to clarify how it aligns with data extraction in order to expand on the current guidance for JBI convergent integrated mixed methods systematic reviews (MMSRs). The convergent integrated approach to MMSRs involves combining extracted data from both quantitative studies (including the quantitative components of mixed methods studies) and qualitative studies (including the qualitative components of mixed methods studies). This process requires data transformation, which can occur either by converting qualitative data into quantitative data (ie, quantitizing) or converting quantitative data into qualitative data (ie, qualitizing). Data transformation involving qualitization is poorly understood in the context of MMSRs, and there is confusion regarding how to undertake this process, with much of the literature specific to primary mixed methods studies. There is a need to expand current guidance and provide more practical advice to reviewers on how to undertake this process. The JBI MMSR Methodology Group took a multipronged approach to update its guidance. First, a structured search of the literature was conducted to determine what is known about data transformation, followed by analysis of a sample of systematic reviews that claimed to use the JBI convergent integrated approach to MMSRs. Approaches were summarized and used to inform the development of draft guidance. This guidance was iteratively revised following a series of online meetings, as well as presented to evidence synthesis experts at an international conference. Finally, the guidance was submitted to the JBI International Scientific Committee for discussion, feedback, and ratification. There is uncertainty in the literature regarding the process of data transformation within the context of MMSRs, with ill-defined approaches provided and variation in practice. In JBI convergent integrated MMSRs, it is recommended that data extraction from quantitative studies (or mixed method studies reporting quantitative findings) stays as close as possible to the data reported in the primary studies. Where data are absent or insufficient to meet the needs of the MMSR, systematic reviewers may need to construct the narrative representation using relevant data from the primary studies. Following data extraction, the process of qualitization occurs where extracted data (both quantitative and qualitative) are assembled, and reviewers are required to conduct detailed examination across data to identify likenesses and create categories based on similarities in meaning. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive guidance currently available for data extraction and qualitization for MMSRs. However, it is important to acknowledge the inherent variability in MMSRs and our methodology may need tailoring for certain situations. Further work will focus on examining how certainty and confidence in findings can be assessed within the framework of MMSRs.

Citation

LIZARONDO, L., STERN, C., SALMOND, S., CARRIER, J., COOPER, K., GODFREY, C., VANDYK, M., POLLOCK, D., RIEGER, K., APOSTOLO, J., KIRKPATRICK, P., BORGES DOS SANTOS, K. and LOVEDAY, H. 2025. Methods for data extraction and data transformation in convergent integrated mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI evidence synthesis [online], 23(3), pages 429-440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00331

• Journal Article Type: Review
• Acceptance Date: Aug 12, 2024
• Online Publication Date: Jan 20, 2025
• Publication Date: Mar 31, 2025
• Deposit Date: Feb 3, 2025
• Publicly Available Date: Jan 21, 2026
• Journal: JBI evidence synthesis
• Electronic ISSN: 2689-8381
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 429-440
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00331
• Keywords: Convergent integrated mixed methods systematic review; Data transformation; Data extraction; Mixed methods systematic review; Qualitization
• Public URL: https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2669452