Margaret Husted
Imposter participants in synchronous qualitative research: a systematic scoping review.
Husted, Margaret; Dowrick, Anna; Porter, Robert; Velo Higueras, Maria; Whitmore, Carly; Evered, Jane; Kennedy, Megan; Scott, Shannon D.
Authors
Anna Dowrick
Robert Porter
Ms Maria Velo Higueras m.velo-higueras@rgu.ac.uk
Lecturer
Carly Whitmore
Jane Evered
Megan Kennedy
Shannon D. Scott
Abstract
Although the issue of bots and fraudulent participants is well established within quantitative research, in recent years there have been increasing incidences of imposter participants within qualitative research. However, how qualitative researchers conceptualise this challenge and what the perceived impact of these imposter participants are, remains underexplored. This systematic scoping review identified 15 articles published since 2018 addressing the topic of imposter participants and fraudulent data in synchronous qualitative research. The review identified that the majority of current articles are commentaries or case study narratives, with little apparent inter disciplinary engagement. Findings indicate that where recommendations are offered these can be subjective or influenced by discipline, with a lack of an evidence informed approach being adopted. The analysis identified three primary issues for applied qualitative research fields, with threats to data integrity and reliability, threats to research diversity, accessibility and reach, and questions of trust and ethics within research highlighted. Developing evidence-based guidance and ensuring cross-disciplinary engagement will be central to maintaining the relevance, impact, and validity of applied qualitative research.
Citation
HUSTED, M., DOWRICK, A., PORTER, R., VELO HIGUERAS, M., WHITMORE, C., EVERED, J., KENNEDY, M. and SCOTT, S.D. 2025. Imposter participants in synchronous qualitative research: a systematic scoping review. International journal of qualitative methods [online], 24, pages 1-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251342542
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 27, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 2, 2025 |
Publication Date | Dec 31, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Mar 6, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 7, 2025 |
Journal | International journal of qualitative methods |
Electronic ISSN | 1609-4069 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 24 |
Pages | 1-10 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251342542 |
Keywords | Imposter; Fraud; Scam; Qualitative research; Data integrity; Research accessibility; Ethical challenges |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2742115 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/16094069251342542 |
Files
HUSTED 2025 Imposter participants in synchronous (VOR)
(847 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Using emoji to explore midwives' perspectives of freebirth.
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Redefining freebirth as a self-care practice: findings from a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Redefining freebirth as a reproductive justice issue.
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
How do midwives feel when women choose to freebirth?
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search