Cindy Stern
The experiences and effectiveness of canine-assisted interventions (CAIs) on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. [Protocol]
Stern, Cindy; Lizarondo, Lucylynn; Carrier, Judith; Godfrey, Christina; Rieger, Kendra; Salmond, Susan; Apostolo, Joao; Kirkpatrick, Pamela; Loveday, Heather
Authors
Lucylynn Lizarondo
Judith Carrier
Christina Godfrey
Kendra Rieger
Susan Salmond
Joao Apostolo
Dr Pamela Kirkpatrick p.kirkpatrick@rgu.ac.uk
Principal Lecturer
Heather Loveday
Abstract
The aim of this mixed methods review is to synthesize and integrate the best available evidence on the experiences and effectiveness of canine-assisted interventions (CAIs) on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care. More specifically the review questions are: 1) What are the experiences of older people residing in long-term care who receive CAIs? 2) What are the views of people directly or indirectly involved in delivering CAIs to older adults (such as family and friends of the residents, healthcare workers and volunteers) regarding CAIs for older people residing in long-term care facilities? 3) What is the effectiveness of CAIs on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care facilities?
Citation
STERN, C., LIZARONDO, L., CARRIER, J., GODFREY, C., RIEGER, K., SALMOND, S., APOSTOLO, J., KIRKPATRICK, P. and LOVEDAY, H. [2020]. The experiences and effectiveness of canine-assisted interventions (CAIs) on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. [Protocol]. PROSPERO [online], item number CRD42020161235. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020161235
Other Type | Protocol |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jul 14, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Feb 15, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 15, 2021 |
Publisher | University of York. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination |
Keywords | Animal-assisted; Canine, dog; Mixed methods; Pet therapy |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/969321 |
Publisher URL | https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020161235 |
Files
STERN 2020 The experiences and effectiveness
(161 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Five common pitfalls in mixed methods systematic reviews: lessons learned.
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search