Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A critique of the concept of accuracy in social information processing models of children’s peer relations.

Woods, Ruth

Authors



Abstract

According to Kenneth Dodge’s social information processing model, children who behave aggressively do so because they interpret others’ behaviour, and evaluate aggressive acts, inaccurately. The concept of accuracy is inappropriate here because members of different social groups can differ systematically in their interpretations and evaluations of behaviour. Imposing the concept of accuracy exalts one social group’s views as accurate, with others seen as flawed. Social information processing models could remove the concept of accuracy by drawing on the theory of autopoiesis, which states that an organism’s response to a stimulus is specified by the organism rather than by the stimulus itself. Thus the environment is seen not as information to be (in)correctly interpreted, but as a set of triggers in a person’s phenomenological world. This approach is strengthened by attention to the myriad ways in which a person’s interpretations are informed (but not determined) by other people, explaining why we are likely to form interpretations and values similar, but not identical, to others in our social groups.

Citation

WOODS, R. 2010. A critique of the concept of accuracy in social information processing models of children’s peer relations. Theory and psychology [online], 20(1), pages 5-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309350243

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Feb 15, 2010
Publication Date Feb 1, 2010
Deposit Date May 4, 2021
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal Theory and psychology
Print ISSN 0959-3543
Electronic ISSN 1461-7447
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 20
Issue 1
Pages 5-27
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309350243
Keywords Accuracy; Autopoiesis; Peer relations; Physical aggression; Social cognition; Social information processing; Umwelt
Public URL https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1328338

Files

WOODS 2010 A critique of the concept (AAM) (355 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© The Author(s), 2010.
Users who receive access to an article through a repository are reminded that the article is protected by copyright and reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. Users may also download and save a local copy of an article accessed in an institutional repository for the user's personal reference. For permission to reuse an article, please follow our Process for Requesting Permission [https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/process-for-requesting-permission].




You might also like



Downloadable Citations