Dr Michele Victoria m.victoria@rgu.ac.uk
Lecturer
Types of peer assessments in group projects.
Victoria, Michele Florencia
Authors
Contributors
Laura Sanderson
Editor
Sally Stone
Editor
Abstract
The P21 Framework for 21st Century Learning identifies collaboration as a key educational outcome as it prepares students for the real world problem solving and enhance their prospects for employment. Therefore, group assessments are becoming a commonplace in higher education, mainly to promote collaborative working environment and peer learning amongst students. In addition, group assessments are considered as an effective assessment strategy to manage large classes as it reduces the marking burden on academics. Despite the benefits, students resent group work particularly when a common group mark is awarded when there is a varying level of inputs from the members of the group. Especially, non- engaging students could possibly attain good grades without contributing to the group work or with minimal contribution. This problem of “free riders” disadvantages and discourages engaging students. There is a plethora of peer assessment methods used by academics to assess group works. However, there is a dearth of studies which explores why a particular method is preferred and the difference it makes on the final grades of students. Therefore, this paper explores different methods of peer assessments by reviewing recent literature and expands into comparing the final grades derived from two different methods of peer assessments adopted in the same module to study the end results. Finally, the correlation between the final individual grades and the peer marks given was unpacked which allows academics to make an informed decision.
Citation
VICTORIA, M.F. 2020. Types of peer assessments in group projects. In Sanderson, L. and Stone, S. Proceedings of 2020 Teaching-learning-research: design and environments, 2-4 December 2020, Manchester, UK. AMPS proceedings series, 22.2. Manchester: AMPS [online], chapter 5, pages 49-58. Available from: https://amps-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Amps-Proceedings-Series-22.2.pdf
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (published) |
---|---|
Conference Name | 2020 Teaching-learning-research: design and environments |
Start Date | Dec 2, 2020 |
End Date | Dec 4, 2020 |
Acceptance Date | May 1, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 2, 2020 |
Publication Date | Dec 2, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jun 30, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 9, 2022 |
Publisher | Architecture Media Politics Society (AMPS) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 49-58 |
Series Title | AMPS proceedings series |
Series Number | 22.2 |
Series ISSN | 2398-9467 |
Chapter Number | Chapter 5 |
Keywords | P21 framework; Collaboration; Real-world problem solving; Higher education; Collaborative working environment; Peer learning; Students |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1699319 |
Publisher URL | http://architecturemps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Amps-Proceedings-Series-22.2-1.pdf |
Files
VICTORIA 2020 Types of peer assessments (VOR)
(413 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Transforming the construction industry towards the next normal.
(2023)
Journal Article
Carbon and cost critical elements: a comparative analysis of two office buildings.
(2017)
Journal Article
Use of social media in construction industry: a case study.
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Social media in construction: an exploratory case study.
(2017)
Book Chapter
Developing an early design stage embodied carbon prediction model: a case study.
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search