Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.

Pollock, Danielle; Peters, Micah D.J.; Khalil, Hanan; McInerney, Patricia; Alexander, Lyndsay; Tricco, Andrea C.; Evans, Catrin; Brandão de Moraes, Érica; Godfrey, Christina M.; Pieper, Dawid; Saran, Ashrita; Stern, Cindy; Munn, Zachary

Abstract

Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss what data should be extracted (and what should not); outline how to analyze extracted data, including an explanation of basic qualitative content analysis; and offer suggestions for the presentation of results in scoping reviews.

Citation

POLLOCK, D., PETERS, M.D.J., KHALIL, H., MCINERNEY, P., ALEXANDER, L., TRICCO, A.C., EVANS, C., BRANDÃO DE MORAES, É., GODFREY, C.M., PIEPER, D., SARAN, A., STERN, C. and MUNN, Z. 2023. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis [online], 21(3), pages 520-532. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 8, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Oct 14, 2022
• Publication Date: Mar 31, 2023
• Deposit Date: Nov 24, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 15, 2023
• Journal: JBI evidence synthesis
• Electronic ISSN: 2689-8381
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 520-532
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123
• Keywords: Research methodology; Scoping reviews; JBI methodology
• Public URL: https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1763528