Ms DOROTHEE MICHEL d.michel@rgu.ac.uk
Research Student
Implementation of medication reviews in community pharmacy: reaching consensus on stakeholders' recommendations for mechanisms of change using the nominal group technique.
Michel, Dorothee E.; Tonna, Antonella P.; Dartsch, Dorothee C.; Weidmann, Anita E.
Authors
Dr Antonella Tonna a.tonna@rgu.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
Dorothee C. Dartsch
Anita E. Weidmann
Abstract
Since 2022, patients with five or more medicines are eligible for a medication review (MR) in a community pharmacy remunerated by the German health system. However, implementation has been slow, with few pharmacies providing MRs. Stakeholders' input is necessary to detail how implementation strategies can be executed effectively on a national level. Prior research identified "external facilitation" and "altering incentives" as crucial strategies to achieve implementation outcomes. To gather stakeholders’ recommendations for, and obtain consensus on, mechanisms of change that allow implementation strategies to work in practice. The consensus method used was the nominal group technique (NGT) with NGT-discussions held separately with pharmacy owners and pharmacy chambers employees. Votes were summed and the relative importance (rI) calculated, defined as (score achieved for a mechanism)/(maximum possible score) × 100. Content analysis provided context for the highest ranked mechanisms and allowed linking to implementation outcomes. Four NGT-discussions were held in 2023 (n = 2 owners; n = 2 chamber employees) with a total of 17 participants. The overall highest ranked mechanisms were fit-for-purpose software (rI = 154.7) detailed process support (rI = 104.9) and an expert support line (rI = 77.7). These together with financial viability (rI = 40.0) were prioritised by both participant groups. Three mechanisms were favoured for both implementation strategies, namely software, process support and materials (rI = 34.3). This study identified stakeholders' priorities for mechanisms of change to implement MRs in community pharmacies. Focusing efforts on the prioritised mechanisms is likely to significantly advance a national implementation plan for countries which are at an early implementation stage.
Citation
MICHEL, D.E., TONNA, A.P., DARTSCH, D.C. and WEIDMANN, A.E. 2024. Implementation of medication reviews in community pharmacy: reaching consensus on stakeholders’ recommendations for mechanisms of change using the nominal group technique. International journal of clinical pharmacy [online], 46(3), pages 714–726. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01708-y
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 24, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 15, 2024 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Mar 26, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 26, 2024 |
Journal | International journal of clinical pharmacy |
Print ISSN | 2210-7703 |
Electronic ISSN | 2210-7711 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 46 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 714–726 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01708-y |
Keywords | Community pharmacy services; Implementation; Mechanism of change; Medication review; Nominal group technique |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2279563 |
Additional Information | This article has been published with separate supporting information. This supporting information has been incorporated into a single file on this repository and can be found at the end of the file associated with this output. |
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Files
MICHEL 2024 Implementation of medication reviews (VOR)
(1.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Version
Updated 2024-09-04
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search