Dr Sarah Henderson s.e.henderson@rgu.ac.uk
Principal Lecturer
Confusion in the courtroom: the effect of confusing questions on eye-witness recall.
Henderson, Sarah E.; Buries, Janet B
Authors
Janet B Buries
Abstract
This paper examines the influence of confusing questions on the accuracy and confidence of adolescents' recall of a mock crime by answering either simple or confusing questions in written form. One hundred and twenty four adolescents (aged between 13 and 17 years) viewed a brief video of an unusual criminal event and were then asked to complete a question booklet addressing what they had seen. Half of the participants were given four categories of confusing questions (negatives, double negatives, complex syntax, and complex vocabulary - all question types typically used within courtroom examinations); the other half were asked simpler forms of the same questions. The confusing questions did reduce accurate recall of an unusual event. The results also suggested that confusing questions weakened the relationship between confidence and accuracy. Poorly worded questions, exacerbated by repetition, potentially corrupt eyewitness memory and derail investigations. The interaction of retrieval access dynamics with traditionally complicated and intimidating courtroom questioning is also addressed.
Citation
HENDERSON, S.E. and BURIES, J.B. 2014. Confusion in the courtroom: the effect of confusing questions on eye-witness recall. Investigative interviewing: reseach and practice (II-RP) [online], 6(1), pages 19-31. Available from: https://iiirg.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/II-RP-Volume-6-Issue-1-Henderson-Buries.pdf
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jun 30, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2014 |
Deposit Date | May 17, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | May 20, 2024 |
Journal | Investigative interviewing: research and practice (II-RP) |
Electronic ISSN | 2047-1416 |
Publisher | International Investigative Interviewing Research Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 19-31 |
Keywords | Confusing questions; Courtroom interviews; Witness; Memory; Confidence-accuracy rates |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2339288 |
Publisher URL | https://iiirg.org/resources/ii-rp-journal-new/ |
Files
HENDERSON 2014 Confusion in the courtroom (VOR)
(298 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2014 International Investigative Interviewing Research Group.
You might also like
The very real horror.
(2023)
Journal Article
Educational attendance and offending outcomes.
(2021)
Report
Extradition and mental health.
(2017)
Journal Article
Alcohol use during pregnancy: an application of the theory of planned behavior.
(2012)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search