Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophy.

Singer, Alec; Wolf, Milo; Generoso, Leonardo; Arias, Elizabeth; Delcastillo, Kenneth; Echevarria, Edwin; Martinez, Amaris; Korakakis, Patroklos Androulakis; Refalo, Martin C.; Swinton, Paul A.; Schoenfeld, Brad J.

Authors

Alec Singer

Milo Wolf

Leonardo Generoso

Elizabeth Arias

Kenneth Delcastillo

Edwin Echevarria

Amaris Martinez

Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis

Martin C. Refalo

Brad J. Schoenfeld



Abstract

We systematically searched the literature for studies with a randomized design that compared different inter-set rest interval durations for estimates of pre-/post-study changes in lean/muscle mass in healthy adults while controlling all other training variables. Bayesian meta-analyses on non-controlled effect sizes using hierarchical models of all 19 measurements (thigh: 10; arm: 6; whole body: 3) from 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria analyses showed substantial overlap of standardized mean differences across the different inter-set rest periods [binary: short: 0.48 (95%CrI: 0.19–0.81), longer: 0.56 (95%CrI: 0.24–0.86); Four categories: short: 0.47 (95%CrI: 0.19–0.80), intermediate: 0.65 (95%CrI: 0.18–1.1), long: 0.55 (95%CrI: 0.15–0.90), very long: 0.50 (95%CrI: 0.14–0.89)], with substantial heterogeneity in results. Univariate and multivariate pairwise meta-analyses of controlled binary (short vs. longer) effect sizes showed similar results for the arm and thigh with central estimates tending to favor longer rest periods [arm: 0.13 (95%CrI: −0.27 to 0.51); thigh: 0.17 (95%CrI: −0.13 to 0.43)]. In contrast, central estimates closer to zero but marginally favoring shorter rest periods were estimated for the whole body [whole body: −0.08 (95%CrI: −0.45 to 0.29)]. Subanalysis of set end-point data indicated that training to failure or stopping short of failure did not meaningfully influence the interaction between rest interval duration and muscle hypertrophy. In conclusion, results suggest a small hypertrophic benefit to employing inter-set rest interval durations >60 s, perhaps mediated by reductions in volume load. However, our analysis did not detect appreciable differences in hypertrophy when resting >90 s between sets, consistent with evidence that detrimental effects on volume load tend to plateau beyond this time-frame. Systematic Review Registration: OSF, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YWEVC.

Citation

SINGER, A., WOLF, M., GENEROSO, L., ARIAS, E., DELCASTILLO, K., ECHEVARRIA, E., MARTINEZ, A., KORAKAKIS, P.A., REFALO, M.C., SWINTON, P.A. and SCHOENFELD, B.J. 2024. Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophy. Frontiers in sports and active living [online], 6, article number 1429789. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1429789

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Jul 30, 2024
Online Publication Date Aug 14, 2024
Publication Date Dec 31, 2024
Deposit Date May 24, 2024
Publicly Available Date May 24, 2024
Journal Frontiers in sports and active living
Electronic ISSN 2624-9367
Publisher Frontiers Media
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Article Number 1429789
DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1429789
Keywords Rest period; Recovery interval; Muscle growth; Muscle development; Muscle thickness; Muscle cross-sectional area
Public URL https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2344312

Files

SINGER 2024 Give it a rest (VOR) (2.4 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2024 Singer, Wolf, Generoso, Arias, Delcastillo, Echevarria, Martinez, Androulakis Korakakis, Refalo, Swinton and Schoenfeld. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations