Alec Singer
Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophy.
Singer, Alec; Wolf, Milo; Generoso, Leonardo; Arias, Elizabeth; Delcastillo, Kenneth; Echevarria, Edwin; Martinez, Amaris; Korakakis, Patroklos Androulakis; Refalo, Martin C.; Swinton, Paul A.; Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Authors
Milo Wolf
Leonardo Generoso
Elizabeth Arias
Kenneth Delcastillo
Edwin Echevarria
Amaris Martinez
Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis
Martin C. Refalo
Dr Paul Swinton p.swinton@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Brad J. Schoenfeld
Abstract
We systematically searched the literature for studies with a randomized design that compared different inter-set rest interval durations for estimates of pre-/post-study changes in lean/muscle mass in healthy adults while controlling all other training variables. Bayesian meta-analyses on non-controlled effect sizes using hierarchical models of all 19 measurements (thigh: 10; arm: 6; whole body: 3) from 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria analyses showed substantial overlap of standardized mean differences across the different inter-set rest periods [binary: short: 0.48 (95%CrI: 0.19–0.81), longer: 0.56 (95%CrI: 0.24–0.86); Four categories: short: 0.47 (95%CrI: 0.19–0.80), intermediate: 0.65 (95%CrI: 0.18–1.1), long: 0.55 (95%CrI: 0.15–0.90), very long: 0.50 (95%CrI: 0.14–0.89)], with substantial heterogeneity in results. Univariate and multivariate pairwise meta-analyses of controlled binary (short vs. longer) effect sizes showed similar results for the arm and thigh with central estimates tending to favor longer rest periods [arm: 0.13 (95%CrI: −0.27 to 0.51); thigh: 0.17 (95%CrI: −0.13 to 0.43)]. In contrast, central estimates closer to zero but marginally favoring shorter rest periods were estimated for the whole body [whole body: −0.08 (95%CrI: −0.45 to 0.29)]. Subanalysis of set end-point data indicated that training to failure or stopping short of failure did not meaningfully influence the interaction between rest interval duration and muscle hypertrophy. In conclusion, results suggest a small hypertrophic benefit to employing inter-set rest interval durations >60 s, perhaps mediated by reductions in volume load. However, our analysis did not detect appreciable differences in hypertrophy when resting >90 s between sets, consistent with evidence that detrimental effects on volume load tend to plateau beyond this time-frame. Systematic Review Registration: OSF, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YWEVC.
Citation
SINGER, A., WOLF, M., GENEROSO, L., ARIAS, E., DELCASTILLO, K., ECHEVARRIA, E., MARTINEZ, A., KORAKAKIS, P.A., REFALO, M.C., SWINTON, P.A. and SCHOENFELD, B.J. 2024. Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophy. Frontiers in sports and active living [online], 6, article number 1429789. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1429789
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 30, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 14, 2024 |
Publication Date | Dec 31, 2024 |
Deposit Date | May 24, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | May 24, 2024 |
Journal | Frontiers in sports and active living |
Electronic ISSN | 2624-9367 |
Publisher | Frontiers Media |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Article Number | 1429789 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1429789 |
Keywords | Rest period; Recovery interval; Muscle growth; Muscle development; Muscle thickness; Muscle cross-sectional area |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2344312 |
Files
SINGER 2024 Give it a rest (VOR)
(2.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2024 Singer, Wolf, Generoso, Arias, Delcastillo, Echevarria, Martinez, Androulakis Korakakis, Refalo, Swinton and Schoenfeld. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search