Hanan Khalil
Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews.
Khalil, Hanan; Pollock, Danielle; McInerney, Patricia; Evans, Catrin; Moraes, Erica B.; Godfrey, Christina M.; Alexander, Lyndsay; Tricco, Andrea; Peters, Micah D.J.; Pieper, Dawid; Saran, Ashrita; Ameen, Daniel; Taneri, Petek Eylul; Munn, Zachary
Authors
Danielle Pollock
Patricia McInerney
Catrin Evans
Erica B. Moraes
Christina M. Godfrey
Dr Lyndsay Alexander l.a.alexander@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Andrea Tricco
Micah D.J. Peters
Dawid Pieper
Ashrita Saran
Daniel Ameen
Petek Eylul Taneri
Zachary Munn
Abstract
This paper describes several automation tools and software that can be considered during evidence synthesis projects and provides guidance for their integration in the conduct of scoping reviews. The guidance presented in this work is adapted from the results of a scoping review and consultations with the JBI Scoping Review Methodology group. This paper describes several reliable, validated automation tools and software that can be used to enhance the conduct of scoping reviews. Developments in the automation of systematic reviews, and more recently scoping reviews, are continuously evolving. We detail several helpful tools in order of the key steps recommended by the JBI's methodological guidance for undertaking scoping reviews including team establishment, protocol development, searching, de-duplication, screening titles and abstracts, data extraction, data charting, and report writing. While we include several reliable tools and software that can be used for the automation of scoping reviews, there are some limitations to the tools mentioned. For example, some are available in English only and their lack of integration with other tools results in limited interoperability. This paper highlighted several useful automation tools and software programs to use in undertaking each step of a scoping review. This guidance has the potential to inform collaborative efforts aiming at the development of evidence informed, integrated automation tools and software packages for enhancing the conduct of high-quality scoping reviews.
Citation
KHALIL, H., POLLOCK, D., MCINERNEY, P., EVANS, C., MORAES, E.B., GODFREY, C.M., ALEXANDER, L., TRICCO, A., PETERS, M.D.J., PIEPER, D., SARAN, A., AMEEN, D., TANERI, P.E. and MUNN, Z. 2024. Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews. Research synthesis methods [online], Early View. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1731
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 2, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 17, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Jun 27, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 27, 2024 |
Journal | Research synthesis methods |
Print ISSN | 1759-2879 |
Electronic ISSN | 1759-2887 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1731 |
Keywords | Methodology; Automation tools; Scoping reviews; Guidance; Quality |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2382403 |
Files
KHALIL 2024 Automation tools to support (VOR-EARLY VIEW)
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Author(s). Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Version
VOR-Early View uploaded 2024.06.27
You might also like
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources.
(2024)
Journal Article
The role of scoping reviews in guideline development.
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search