Dr Binam Ghimire b.ghimire@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Testing the weak-form efficiency of agriculture's capital markets.
Ghimire, Binam; Annussek, Kolja; Harvey, Jackie; Sharma, Satish
Authors
Kolja Annussek
Jackie Harvey
Satish Sharma
Abstract
This paper investigates the empirical validity of the weak-form Efficient Market Hypothesis [EMH] in global equity markets for agriculture. We examine whether developed agriculture markets are more efficient than emerging agriculture markets. We test six agriculture and food chain indices over the period of time between 2010 and 2013. The weak EMH was tested using the parametric Augmented Dickey-Fuller test as well as the non-parametric Runs test and Autocorrelation function test. The parametric test suggested some evidence for the existence of the weak-form EMH for all six indices in at least some of the five tested periods. However the non-parametric tests clearly proved the inefficiency of all indexes during all periods. Thus we finally rejected the null hypothesis for all indices in all periods. Accordingly agriculture's developed markets are equally inefficient and predictable as its emerging markets. The results of this work suggest that investors can achieve superior returns by investing in agricultural equity markets following a technical analysis and active portfolio approach. Thus this work is in great interest of investors and portfolio managers following an agriculture strategy. The study adds value to current research of market efficiency in developed as well as emerging markets.
Citation
GHIMIRE, B., ANNUSSEK, K., HARVEY, J. and SHARMA, S. 2016. Testing the weak-form efficiency of agriculture's capital markets. Economics and business review [online], 2(2), pages 3-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2016.2.1
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 16, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 30, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Aug 20, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 20, 2024 |
Journal | Economics and business review |
Print ISSN | 2392-1641 |
Electronic ISSN | 2450-0097 |
Publisher | Poznań University of Economics and Business Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 3-17 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2016.2.1 |
Keywords | Efficient market hypothesis (EMH); Equity markets; Agriculture markets |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2439447 |
Files
GHIMIRE 2016 Testing the weak-form
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Does it pay to be employee-owned? On the performance of knowledge-intensive firms.
(2024)
Journal Article
When Bitcoin is high: cryptocurrency value, illicit markets and US marijuana bills.
(2024)
Journal Article
When ESG meets AAA: the effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns.
(2021)
Journal Article
Effects of official versus online review ratings.
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search