Skip to main content

Research Repository

See what's under the surface

The continuing refinement of habitual residence: R, petitioner.

Hill, David

Authors

David Hill



Abstract

The past two years have provided fertile ground for judicial consideration of habitual residence as a factor connecting a person to a specific legal jurisdiction. Since September 2013, the connecting factor has been considered twice by the Court of Justice of the European Union1 and four times by the Supreme Court.2 These judgments were followed by a plethora of decisions from the lower courts, particularly the family division of the High Court, in which the question of habitual residence has been considered in myriad factual circumstances. The principal focus of this analysis is the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the Scottish case of R, Petitioner,3 but in order fully to understand the context in which this decision was made it is necessary first to consider the development of the law in these earlier judgments, particularly that of A v A.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 5, 2016
Journal Edinburgh law review
Print ISSN 1364-9809
Electronic ISSN 1755-1692
Publisher Edinburgh University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 20
Issue 1
Pages 82-86
Institution Citation HILL, D. 2015. The continuing refinement of habitual residence: R, petitioner. Edinburgh law review [online], 20(1), pages 82-86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2016.0325
DOI https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2016.0325
Keywords Habitual residence; Legal jurisdiction; Family division; R; Petitioner

Files







Downloadable Citations