Interplay between contract and public law: implications for major construction contracts and transparency.
Mante, Joseph; Ndekugri, Issaka
The relationship between infrastructure project owners and their contractors is generally governed by contract law. However, where the project owner is a State, there are often additional requirements from public law to be complied with. The challenges posed by the interplay between public law and private contractual relationships in such context have been highlighted by litigation concerning the effect of a constitutional requirement that any international business and economic transaction to which the Government of Ghana (GoG) is a party is not to become operational without parliamentary approval. Through analysis of five decisions of the Supreme Court of Ghana on the interpretation of this constitutional provision, this piece highlights the devastating consequences that inattention to public law could have on parties who contract with the GoG and its agencies. It also examines the extent to which the judicial interpretation of the constitutional requirement really furthers the interests of transparency and openness that it was intended to promote.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Mar 1, 2017|
|Journal||Public procurement law review|
|Publisher||Sweet and Maxwell|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Institution Citation||MANTE, J. and NDEKUGRI, I. 2017. Interplay between contract and public law: implications for major construction contracts and transparency. Public procurement law review [online], 2, pages 98-114. Available from: https:westlaw.co.uk.|
|Keywords||Private law; Public law; Construction contracts; Engineering contracts; Probity; Transparency|
MANTE 2017 Interplay between contract and public
You might also like
Mutual trust and co-operation under NEC 3&4: a fresh perspective.
Arbitrability and public policy: an African perspective.
Resolving infrastructure-related construction disputes in developing countries: the Ghana experience.