REGINA OFORI-BOATENG r.ofori-boateng@rgu.ac.uk
Research Student
Enhancing systematic reviews: an in-depth analysis on the impact of active learning parameter combinations for biomedical abstract screening.
Ofori-Boateng, Regina; Trujillo-Escobar, Tamy Goretty; Aceves-Martins, Magaly; Wiratunga, Nirmalie; Moreno-Garcia, Carlos Francisco
Authors
Tamy Goretty Trujillo-Escobar
Magaly Aceves-Martins
Professor Nirmalie Wiratunga n.wiratunga@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Dean for Research
Dr Carlos Moreno-Garcia c.moreno-garcia@rgu.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
Abstract
Systematic Review (SR) are foundational to influencing policies and decision-making in healthcare and beyond. SRs thoroughly synthesise primary research on a specific topic while maintaining reproducibility and transparency. However, the rigorous nature of SRs introduces two main challenges: significant time involved and the continuously growing literature, resulting in potential data omission, making most SRs become outmoded even before they are published. As a solution, AI techniques have been leveraged to simplify the SR process, especially the abstract screening phase. Active learning (AL) has emerged as a preferred method among these AI techniques, allowing interactive learning through human input. Several AL software have been proposed for abstract screening. Despite its prowess, how the various parameters involved in AL influence the software’s efficacy is still unclear. This research seeks to demystify this by exploring how different AL strategies, such as initial training set, query strategies etc. impact SR automation. Experimental evaluations were conducted on five complex medical SR datasets, and the GLM model was used to interpret the findings statistically. Some AL variables, such as the feature extractor, initial training size, and classifiers, showed notable observations and practical conclusions were drawn within the context of SR and beyond where AL is deployed.
Citation
OFORI-BOATENG, R., TRUJILLO-ESCOBAR, T.G., ACEVES-MARTINS, M., WIRATUNGA, N. and MORENO-GARCIA, C.F. 2024. Enhancing systematic reviews: an in-depth analysis on the impact of active learning parameter combinations for biomedical abstract screening. Artificial intelligence in medicine [online], 157, article number 102989. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102989
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 22, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 26, 2024 |
Publication Date | Nov 30, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Sep 26, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 26, 2024 |
Journal | Artificial intelligence in medicine |
Print ISSN | 0933-3657 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-2860 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 157 |
Article Number | 102989 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102989 |
Keywords | Evidence-based medicine; Systematic reviews; Literature reviews; Research methodologies; Machine learning; Human-in-the-loop |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2487383 |
Files
OFORI-BOATENG 2024 Enhancing systematic reviews (VOR)
(841 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Evaluation of attention-based LSTM and Bi-LSTM networks for abstract text classification in systematic literature review automation.
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
A zero-shot monolingual dual stage information retrieval system for Spanish biomedical systematic literature reviews.
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Enhancing abstract screening classification in evidence-based medicine: incorporating domain knowledge into pre-trained models.
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Non-deterministic solvers and explainable AI through trajectory mining.
(2021)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search