Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Multi-criteria decision-making approach to material selection for abandonment of high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) wells exposed to harsh reservoir fluids.

Chukwuemeka, Augustine Okechukwu; Oluyemi, Gbenga; Mohammed, Auwalu I.; Attar, Suhail; Njuguna, James

Authors

Augustine Okechukwu Chukwuemeka

Auwalu I. Mohammed



Abstract

Portland cement is the primary barrier material for well abandonment. However, the limitations of cement, especially under harsh downhole conditions, are necessitating research into alternative barrier materials. While several alternatives have been proposed, the screening process leading to their selection is scarcely discussed in the literature, resulting in the non-repeatability of the selection process. This study develops a dynamic multi-criteria decision-making technique for assessing the material options for the abandonment of high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) wells with exposure to harsh reservoir fluids. The material screening process is performed in ANSYS Granta and a combined technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach is used for ranking the shortlisted material alternatives based on seven material properties proven in the literature to be critical to the long-term integrity of well barrier materials. Nine alternative materials are ranked against Portland cement and high alumina cement. The results show that the top-ranking materials are from the phenol formaldehyde and polyamide–imide groups. Of these, the primary production CO2 of the polyamide–imide is, on average, about 25 times higher than the primary production CO2 of the phenol formaldehyde material. A sensitivity analysis of the methodology confirms that the criteria with the highest initial weights are the most impactful in terms of the final rank. The material property values also have an impact on the extent to which variations in their weights affect the hierarchical position of the materials in the TOPSIS-AHP analysis. Despite their higher cost per unit volume, the alternative materials consistently outperformed cement—even when average price was weighted more heavily than the most influential mechanical property.

Citation

CHUKWUEMEKA, A.O., OLUYEMI, G., MOHAMMED, A.I., ATTAR, S. and NJUGUNA, J. 2025. Multi-criteria decision-making approach to material selection for abandonment of high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) wells exposed to harsh reservoir fluids. Polymers [online], 17(10), article number 1329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17101329

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 7, 2025
Online Publication Date May 13, 2025
Publication Date May 31, 2025
Deposit Date May 14, 2025
Publicly Available Date May 14, 2025
Journal Polymers
Electronic ISSN 2073-4360
Publisher MDPI
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 17
Issue 10
Article Number 1329
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17101329
Keywords Polymer resins; Oil and gas wells; Well integrity; Decommissioning; Well abandonment; Plug and abandonment; Materials selection; Multi-criteria decision-making
Public URL https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2836285

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations