Hanan Khalil
Conducting high quality scoping reviews: challenges and solutions.
Khalil, Hanan; Peters, Micah D.J.; Tricco, Andrea C.; Pollock, Danielle; Alexander, Lyndsay; McInerney, Patricia; Godfrey, Christina M.; Munn, Zachary
Authors
Micah D.J. Peters
Andrea C. Tricco
Danielle Pollock
Dr Lyndsay Alexander l.a.alexander@rgu.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Patricia McInerney
Christina M. Godfrey
Zachary Munn
Abstract
Objectives: Scoping reviews are being increasingly used by researchers. The objective of this article was to outline some challenges and potential solutions to improve the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. Study Design and Setting: The JBI scoping review methodology group consists of 9 experts in the field of scoping reviews. This article summarizes the key issues facing reviewers who conduct scoping reviews and those who use the results from scoping reviews and may engage in consultations during their development. Results: Several key issues have been identified for reviewers as challenges in conducting scoping reviews. Challenges may be faced throughout the conduct of the review, from developing the a priori protocol to finalizing the review report for publication and developing implications or recommendations for research, policy, and practice from the results of the review. Challenges to publishing scoping reviews may stem from a lack of understanding of scoping reviews by journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers to extending the conclusion drawn from these reviews to generate recommendations for practice and policy. Conclusion: By identifying and overcoming challenges to the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews, reviewers may better ensure that scoping reviews are effective in meeting the objectives of scoping reviews.
Citation
KHALIL, H., PETERS, M.D.J., TRICCO, A.C., POLLOCK, D., ALEXANDER, L., MCINERNEY, P., GODFREY, C.M. and MUNN, Z. 2021. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of clinical epidemiology [online], 130, pages 156-160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009
Journal Article Type | Commentary |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 14, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 26, 2020 |
Publication Date | Feb 28, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Nov 16, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 27, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
Print ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-5921 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 130 |
Pages | 156-160 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009 |
Keywords | Scoping reviews; Methodology; Quality; Reporting |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/979579 |
Files
KHALIL 2021 Conducting high quality
(347 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources.
(2024)
Journal Article
The role of scoping reviews in guideline development.
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search