Andrew M'manga
Folk risk analysis: factors influencing security analysts' interpretation of risk.
M'manga, Andrew; Faily, Shamal; McAlaney, John; Williams, Christopher
Authors
Shamal Faily
John McAlaney
Christopher Williams
Abstract
There are several standard approaches to risk analysis recommended for use in information security, however, the actual application of risk analysis by security analysts follows an opaque mix of standard risk analysis procedures and adaptations based on an analyst's understanding of risk. We refer to these approaches as Folk Risk Analysis. To understand folk risk analysis, we present the results of a study where Distributed Cognition and Grounded Theory were used to elicit factors influencing risk interpretation by security analysts, and the constrained conditions to risk decision-making they encounter.
Citation
M'MANGA, A., FAILY, S., MCALANEY, J. and WILLIAMS, C. 2017. Folk risk analysis: factors influencing security analysts' interpretation of risk. Presented at the 3rd Workshop on security information workers (WSIW 2017), part of the 13th Symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS 2017), co-located with the 2017 USENIX annual technical conference (USENIX ATC 2017), 12-14 July 2017, Santa Clara, USA. Hosted on the USENIX website [online]. Available from: https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/workshop-program/wsiw2017/mmanga
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (unpublished) |
---|---|
Conference Name | 3rd Workshop on security information workers (WSIW 2017), part of the 13th Symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS 2017), co-located with the 2017 USENIX annual technical conference (USENIX ATC 2017) |
Start Date | Jul 12, 2017 |
End Date | Jul 14, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 5, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 7, 2021 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Keywords | Systems security; Security risk analysis; Decision-making; Software engineering |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1437909 |
Publisher URL | https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/workshop-program/wsiw2017/mmanga |
Files
M'MANGA 2017 Folk risk analysis
(713 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Privacy goals for the data lifecycle.
(2022)
Journal Article
Assessing system of systems information security risk with OASoSIS.
(2022)
Journal Article
Visualising personas as goal models to find security tensions.
(2021)
Journal Article
Evaluating privacy: determining user privacy expectations on the web.
(2021)
Journal Article
DPIA in context: applying DPIA to assess privacy risks of cyber physical systems.
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search