The bone biomarker response to an acute bout of exercise: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Dolan, Eimear; Dumas, Alina; Keane, Karen M.; Bestetti, Giulia; Freitas, Luisa Helena Mavalli; Gualano, Bruno; Kohrt, Wendy M.; Kelley, George A.; Pereira, Rosa Maria Rodrigues; Sale, Craig; Swinton, Paul A.

Abstract

Circulating biomarkers are often used to investigate the bone response to an acute bout of exercise, but heterogeneity in factors such as study design, quality, selected biomarkers and exercise and participant characteristics render it difficult to synthesize and evaluate available evidence. To quantify the effects of an acute exercise bout on bone biomarkers, along with the influence of potential moderators such as participant, exercise and design characteristics, using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach. The protocol was designed in accordance with PRISMA-P guidelines and prospectively published. Seven databases were systematically searched in accordance with pre-defined eligibility criteria. Bayesian three-level hierarchical meta-analysis models were used to explore main effects of acute exercise on bone biomarkers, as well as potential moderating factors. Modelled effect sizes were interpreted according to three metrics namely: A) Evidence of an effect (defined by whether, or how much of, the CrI included zero); B) The size of that effect (threshold values of 0.01, 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 were used to describe effect sizes as very small, small, medium and large, respectively); and C) The level of certainty in the estimated effect (defined using the GRADE framework). Pooling of outcomes across all designs and categories indicated that an acute bout of exercise increased bone resorption (ES0.5=0.10 [95%CrI: 0.00 to 0.20] and formation (ES0.5=0.05 [95%CrI: 0.01 to 0.08] markers, but the effects were very small and highly variable Moderator analyses revealed the source of some of this variability and indicated that exercise type and impact loading influenced the bone resorptive response. A moderate increase in CTX-1 was observed in response to cycling (ES0.5=0.65 [95%CrI: 0.20 to 0.99]), with greater durations and more work leading to larger CTX-1 increases. CTX-1 response peaked within 15 minutes and 2 hours after the exercise bout. Other exercise types did not influence CTX-1. Changes to all bone formation markers were very small and transient, with the very small increases returning to baseline within 15 minutes of exercise cessation. No major trends for bone formation markers were identified across any of the moderating categories investigated. Certainty of evidence in most outcomes was deemed to be low or very low. CONCLUSION: The large influence of an acute bout of prolonged cycling on the bone resorption marker CTX-1, alongside the lack of a response of any biomarker to resistance or high-impact exercise types, indicate that these biomarkers may be more useful at investigating potentially osteolytic aspects of exercise, and raises questions about their suitability to investigate the osteogenic potential of different exercise types, at least in the short term and in response to a single exercise bout. Certainty in all outcomes was low or very low, due to factors including risk of bias, lack of non-exercise controls, inconsistency, imprecision and small-study effects. Protocol Registration and Publication: This investigation was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework Registry (https://osf.io/6f8dz) and the full protocol underwent peer-review prior to conducting the investigation.

Citation

DOLAN, E., DUMAS, A., KEANE, K.M., BESTETTI, G., FREITAS, L.H.M., GUALANO, B., KOHRT, W.M., KELLY, G.A., PEREIRA, R.M.R., SALE, C. and SWINTON, P.A. 2022. The bone biomarker response to an acute bout of exercise: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports medicine [online], 52(12), pages 2837-2851. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01718-8

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 3, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Jul 23, 2022
• Publication Date: Dec 31, 2022
• Deposit Date: Jun 9, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 24, 2023
• Journal: Sports medicine
• Print ISSN: 0112-1642
• Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
• Publisher: Springer
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 52
• Issue: 12
• Pages: 2837-2851
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01718-8
• Keywords: Biomarkers; Bone response; Exercise; Participant
• Public URL: https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1681889
• Related Public URLs: https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1003590 (Protocol); https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1724559 (Dataset)