Louise Fleng Sandal
Data Collector
Effectiveness of app-delivered, tailored self-management support for adults with lower back pain-related disability: a selfBACK randomized clinical trial. [Dataset]
Contributors
Kerstin Bach
Data Collector
Cecilie K. �ver�s
Data Collector
Professor Nirmalie Wiratunga n.wiratunga@rgu.ac.uk
Data Curator
Professor Kay Cooper k.cooper@rgu.ac.uk
Data Collector
Abstract
SELFBACK is an evidence-based decision support system that supports self-management of nonspecific low back pain. In specific, SELFBACK provides the user with evidence-based advice on physical activity level, strength/ flexibility exercises, and educational content. The self-management advice is delivered via a smartphone app and individually tailored to the user’s personal goals, personal characteristics, symptom progression and functional level. The SELFBACK system uses the case-based reasoning (CBR) methodology to capture and reuse knowledge from successful previous cases to suggest the most suitable self-management plan for a current user. Figure 1 illustrates the architecture of the SELFBACK system and the process for producing and tailoring the weekly self-management plans (steps 1-5). In the current trial, patients with low back pain were referred to the research project from their primary care clinician (general practitioner, physiotherapist, chiropractor) or an outpatient spine clinic. The patient was screened for eligibility by a research assistant and if eligible, invited to the trial and sent a link to an online web-based questionnaire (step 1). The questionnaire information was used to create a user profile (step 2), initiate the first CBR cycle (i.e., matching of the current case with the most similar and successful previous case in the SELFBACK case-base), and produce the first weekly self-management plan. The resulting self-management plan is pushed to the mobile phone (step 3) and accessed by the user (step 4). On a weekly basis, the users answered a set of tailoring questions in the app (eg, pain intensity, self-efficacy level, fear-avoidance level, barriers to self-management etc.). In addition, physical activity was tracked by a step detecting wristband (Mi Band 3, Xiaomi) connected to the SELFBACK app. The self-reported data and the objective physical activity data for the past week was then fed back to the CBR system (step 5) where the refined and enhanced user profile was matched with the most similar and successful case in the case-base to create and tailor the next weekly self-management plan. This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.
Citation
SANDAL, L.F., BACH, K., ØVERÅS, C.K., WIRATUNGA, N., COOPER, K, et al. 2021. Effectiveness of app-delivered, tailored self-management support for adults with lower back pain-related disability: a selfBACK randomized clinical trial. [Dataset]. JAMA internal medicine [online], 181(10), pages 1288-1296. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2782459#supplemental-tab
Acceptance Date | Jun 11, 2021 |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Aug 2, 2021 |
Publication Date | Oct 31, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Aug 5, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 5, 2021 |
Publisher | American Medical Association (AMA) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097 |
Keywords | SelfBACK; Evidence-based; Self-management support system; Lower back pain (LBP); Smartphone app |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1400289 |
Related Public URLs | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1400226 |
Type of Data | PDF file. |
Collection Date | Jul 1, 2021 |
Collection Method | The full methodology is described in a published journal article: SANDAL, L.F., BACK, K., ØVERÅS, C.K., WIRATUNGA, N., COOPER, K, et al. 2021. Effectiveness of app-delivered, tailored self-management support for adults with lower back pain-related disability: a selfBACK randomized clinical trial. JAMA internal medicine [online], 181(10), pages 1288-1296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097 |
Files
SANDAL 2021 Effectivenss of app-delivered (SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL)
(925 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources.
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search