Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Forensic delay analysis: an investigation of the reasons for disagreements in time-related disputes.

Atanasov, Vasil; Greenwood, David; Thurairajah, Niraj; Hatcher, Cara

Authors

David Greenwood

Niraj Thurairajah

Cara Hatcher



Contributors

Lloyd Scott
Editor

Christopher J. Neilson
Editor

Abstract

Construction project delays are widespread and persistent. Disputes frequently occur, and their complexity and value has produced a role for experts specialising in Forensic Delay Analysis (FDA). Previous literature suggests that the main problem (and the main generator of escalated disputes) lies with the insufficiency and/or poor quality of available information. In this study, twelve disputes were examined for their key points of disagreement. These cases indicate that there are, in fact, four distinct factors: namely the availability, validity, and disclosure of relevant information, and the approach taken to its analysis. Insufficiency and poor quality of information was indeed a factor in these disputes, but not the only one; the apparently deliberate lack of transparency, the selective interpretation of information, and the subjective adoption of delay analysis method are at least as important in creating and amplifying the dispute. The resulting interplay between the availability of reliable data, the readiness of actors in providing it, and the conflicting motives behind the way it is analysed by experts results in a zero-sum gamble for the parties seeking the resolution of delays and their consequences. This could be partially or fully avoided by (i) exploiting advances in information technology; (ii) the introduction of agreed contractual delay protocols; and/or (iii) radical changes to the concept of 'ownership' of information. The work presented here is part of a wider study examining the impact of advances in information technology on the more efficient resolution (or even avoidance) of contractual disputes.

Citation

ATANASOV, V., GREENWOOD, D., THURAIRAJAH, N. and HATCHER, C. 2021. Forensic delay analysis: an investigation of the reasons for disagreements in time-related disputes. In Scott, L., Neilson, C.J. (eds.) Proceedings of 37th ARCOM (Association of Researchers in Construction Management) annual conference 2021: recover, rebuild and renew: shifting mindsets and practices to change the future, 6-7 September 2021, [virtual conference]. Leeds: ARCOM [online], pages 460-469. Available from: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/c53e4fee934df27582826028fc94751f.pdf

Conference Name 37th ARCOM (Association of Researchers in Construction Management) annual conference 2021: recover, rebuild and renew: shifting mindsets and practices to change the future
Conference Location [virtual conference]
Start Date Sep 6, 2021
End Date Sep 7, 2021
Acceptance Date Feb 15, 2021
Online Publication Date Sep 7, 2021
Publication Date Dec 31, 2021
Deposit Date Jul 1, 2022
Publicly Available Date Mar 28, 2024
Publisher ARCOM Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Pages 460-469
Book Title Proceedings of 37th (ARCOM) Association of Researchers in Construction Management annual conference 2021 (ARCOM 2021)
ISBN 9780995546356
Keywords Case studies; Contactual disputes; Information technology; Project delay
Public URL https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1699463
Publisher URL https://tinyurl.com/pxk38j8y

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations