Dr Katherine Burgess k.burgess@rgu.ac.uk
Lecturer
Dr Katherine Burgess k.burgess@rgu.ac.uk
Lecturer
Mark J. Connick
Philip Graham-Smith
Stephen J. Pearson
The purpose of this study was to concurrently determine the effect that plyometric and isometric training has on tendon stiffness (K) and muscle output characteristics to compare any subsequent changes. Thirteen men trained the lower limbs either plyometrically or isometrically 2–3 times a week for a 6-week period. Medial gastrocnemius tendon stiffness was measured in vivo using ultrasonography during ramped isometric contractions before and after training. Mechanical output variables were measured using a force plate during concentric and isometric efforts. Significant (p < 0.05) training-induced increases in tendon K were seen for the plyometric (29.4%; 49.0 < 10.8 to 63.4 < 9.2 N·mm-1) and isometric groups (61.6%; 43.9 < 2.5 to 71.0 < 7.4 N·mm-1). Statistically similar increases in rate of force development and jump height were also seen for both training groups, with increases of 18.9 and 58.6% for the plyometric group and 16.7 and 64.3% for the isometric group, respectively. Jump height was found to be significantly correlated with tendon stiffness, such that stiffness could explain 21% of the variance in jump height. Plyometric training has been shown to place large stresses on the body, which can lead to a potential for injury, whereas explosive isometric training has been shown here to provide similar benefits to that of plyometric training with respect to the measured variables, but with reduced impact forces, and would therefore provide a useful adjunct for athletic training programs within a 6-week time frame.
BURGESS, K.E., CONNICK, M.J., GRAHAM-SMITH, P. and PEARSON, S.J. 2007. Plyometric vs isometric training influences on tendon properties and muscle output. Journal of strength and conditioning research [online], 21(3), pages 986-989. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/R-20235.1
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Aug 31, 2007 |
Publication Date | Aug 31, 2007 |
Deposit Date | Sep 4, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 30, 2024 |
Journal | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
Print ISSN | 1064-8011 |
Electronic ISSN | 1533-4287 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 21 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 986-989 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1519/R-20235.1 |
Keywords | Tendon stiffness; Rate of force development; Exercise |
Public URL | https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2060333 |
BURGESS 2007 Plyometric vs isometric training (AAM)
(693 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2007 National Strength and Conditioning Association. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. The published version of record BURGESS, K.E., CONNICK, M.J., GRAHAM-SMITH, P. and PEARSON, S.J. 2007. Plyometric vs isometric training influences on tendon properties and muscle output. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 21(3), pages 986-989 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1519/R-20235.1
About OpenAIR@RGU
Administrator e-mail: publications@rgu.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search