Benedict H. Stephens Hemingway
The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: a simulation approach.
Stephens Hemingway, Benedict H.; Burgess, Katherine E.; Elyan, Eyad; Swinton, Paul A.
Dr Katherine Burgess email@example.com
Academic Team Lead
Professor Eyad Elyan firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Paul Swinton email@example.com
This study investigated the effects of measurement error and testing frequency on prediction accuracy of the standard fitness-fatigue model. A simulation-based approach was used to systematically assess measurement error and frequency inputs commonly used when monitoring the training of athletes. Two hypothetical athletes (intermediate and advanced) were developed and realistic training loads and daily ‘true’ power values were generated using the fitness-fatigue model across 16 weeks. Simulations were then completed by adding Gaussian measurement errors to true values with mean 0 and set standard deviations to recreate more and less reliable measurement practices used in real-world settings. Errors were added to the model training phase (weeks 1–8) and sampling of data was used to recreate different testing frequencies (every day to once per week) when obtaining parameter estimates. In total, 210 sets of simulations (N = 104 iterations) were completed using an iterative hill-climbing optimisation technique. Parameter estimates were then combined with training loads in the model testing phase (weeks 9–16) to quantify prediction errors. Regression analyses identified positive associations between prediction errors and the linear combination of measurement error and testing frequency (R2adj =0.87–0.94). Significant model improvements (P < 0.001) were obtained across all scenarios by including an interaction term demonstrating greater deleterious effects of measurement error at low testing frequencies.The findings of this simulation study represent a lower-bound case and indicate that in real-world settings, where a fitness-fatigue model is used to predict training response, measurement practices that generate coefficients of variation greater than ≈4% will not provide satisfactory results.
STEPHENS HEMINGWAY, B.H., BURGESS, K.E., ELYAN, E. and SWINTON, P.A. 2020. The effects of measurement error and testing frequency on the fitness-fatigue model applied to resistance training: a simulation approach. International journal of sports science and coaching [online], 15(1), pages 60-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119887721
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Oct 17, 2019|
|Online Publication Date||Nov 7, 2019|
|Publication Date||Feb 1, 2020|
|Deposit Date||Oct 21, 2019|
|Publicly Available Date||Oct 21, 2019|
|Journal||International journal of sports science and coaching|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Measurement error; Testing frequency; Prediction; Fitness-fagitue model; Athletes; Banister; Modelling; TRIMPS; Vertical jump; Strength and conditioning; Training load|
STEPHENS HEMINGWAY 2020 The effects of measurement
Publisher Licence URL
You might also like
Independent evaluation of ARMED service: final report.
Reply to G.A. Sforzo.